As most mainstream media ignores the event!
Two civilians rushed to their cars to get their guns before fatally shooting Oklahoma City restaurant gunman...
"These guys were protecting somebody else's life. I would think more than likely they would not be filed on," Matthews said."
SO, is he actually stating that had these guys been defending their own lives, they would be charged? My guess is, yes!
But how could they be charged? Doesn't the Constitutional LAW of the LAND state, that anyone of lawful age can carry their weapon with them and ON them anytime they wish without fear of intervention or reprisal, etc.? Well, by golly! Yes, it does!
But not inside one of the many States whose lawmakers are not at all "lawfully" minded or care much about [Inalieable Rights!]
I believe that we are now well beyond asking them the question - WHAT PART OF "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND!
In comes Mary Fallin, and boy is she Fallin down on the job:
"Gov. Mary Fallin, who vetoed a bill that would have eliminated the requirement for people to have completed a firearms training course in order to carry guns in public. The NRA supported the proposed bill, but the Republican governor, who has supported concealed carry and open carry laws in the past, vetoed it. (Emphasis added)
“I believe the firearms laws we currently have in place are effective, appropriate and minimal, and serve to reassure our citizens that people who are carrying handguns in this state are qualified to do so,” she said in a statement explaining her veto."